Fck ff nd d, Rlph

[womzilla]

Daily Kos has poll numbers:

New Mexico

American Research Group. 3/30-4/1. MoE 4%. No trend lines.

Bush 46
Kerry 45
Nader 3

(Entry title courtesy of Xopher. If you don't get the joke, you should probably read TNH's blog Making Light more often.)

UPDATE: Be sure to read the comments for more about why Rlph should fck ff nd d.

Comments

[spacecrab.livejournal.com]

>I honestly don't understand what would make someone want to vote for
>Nader this year. Can you tell me?

The belief that this year isn't that much different than other years with
bad Republican candidates and "weak" Democratic candidates.

What is a "weak" Democratic candidate? One who isn't willing to announce his intention to dismantle the corporate power structure that controls the United States, *right now.*

Why are they willing to vote to keep the country in Hell rather than put it back into Heck? I think that's the question that needs to be worked on with them, if we want to rescue that 2% to 4% of the vote. Vote for Kucinich or someone like him in a year when the alternative isn't granting a license for selfish incompetents to dismantle the rest of the United States.

[womzilla.livejournal.com]

What is a "weak" Democratic candidate? One who isn't willing to announce his intention to dismantle the corporate power structure that controls the United States, *right now.*

I recognize the rhetoric, but I don't even understand what it means. What specific policy initiative or initiatives should a Democrat espouse that would make him (or her) not a "weak" candidate?

[avram]

I'd also like a candidate that'll cure all disease and repeal the lightspeed limit.