At least the 1993 incident (a kid named Chandler) never came to guilt or innocence, but was settled out of court by Jackson with a big payment to Chandler's family. Chandler purportedly could describe Jackson's penis in detail.
So, at least in that case, Jackson was not found guilty, but neither was he found innocent. I do not generally assume that settling=guilty, but it looks kind-of bad in this case.
According to Wikipedia (where I checked my memory), Chandler (with a journalist) wrote a tell-all book, and I'm trying to decide whether O want to try to get a used copy online: is that too sleazy, or just sleazy enough?
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
no subject
Date: 2009-06-27 01:55 pm (UTC)So, at least in that case, Jackson was not found guilty, but neither was he found innocent. I do not generally assume that settling=guilty, but it looks kind-of bad in this case.
According to Wikipedia (where I checked my memory), Chandler (with a journalist) wrote a tell-all book, and I'm trying to decide whether O want to try to get a used copy online: is that too sleazy, or just sleazy enough?