Politics: A rhetorical reframing
May. 8th, 2008 10:34 pmI realized about a week ago that there's a pretty simple rhetorical tool that progressives, liberals, and just plain sane people can use to help assure the defeat of the lickspittles in Congress who are not Democrats or Socialists.
From now until January 20, 2009, there is no more Republican party in my language. Instead, there is "Bush's party". If I need an abbreviation, they are the BOP (Bush's Own Party).
That's all.
This idea came to me when I was listening to Harry Reid on Morning Edition, talking about the "moderate" members of the opposition party--specifically Arlen Specter, but also people like Olympia Snowe, Susan Collins, and sometimes Chuck Hegel. What Reid said was that Specter was "always on our side, except when we need him and he votes with the Republicans." What's really going on is Specter votes with Bush, on every crucial vote. Hence, Bush's party.
There used to be honest, decent members of Lincoln's party in Washington; when there were, they deserved the name of the party he lead. But for the past fourteen years, those officials have all been high on Gingrichism and drunk with Bush. Bush couldn't have driven this country into the abyss without the gleeful, consistent, and unwavering support of his Congressional lackeys. Let them all wear his name. Maybe after a generation of self-examination, chastisement, humiliation, purges, reconsiderations, and repentance, they might again be worth of the letter R. But not now.
From now until January 20, 2009, there is no more Republican party in my language. Instead, there is "Bush's party". If I need an abbreviation, they are the BOP (Bush's Own Party).
That's all.
This idea came to me when I was listening to Harry Reid on Morning Edition, talking about the "moderate" members of the opposition party--specifically Arlen Specter, but also people like Olympia Snowe, Susan Collins, and sometimes Chuck Hegel. What Reid said was that Specter was "always on our side, except when we need him and he votes with the Republicans." What's really going on is Specter votes with Bush, on every crucial vote. Hence, Bush's party.
There used to be honest, decent members of Lincoln's party in Washington; when there were, they deserved the name of the party he lead. But for the past fourteen years, those officials have all been high on Gingrichism and drunk with Bush. Bush couldn't have driven this country into the abyss without the gleeful, consistent, and unwavering support of his Congressional lackeys. Let them all wear his name. Maybe after a generation of self-examination, chastisement, humiliation, purges, reconsiderations, and repentance, they might again be worth of the letter R. But not now.
no subject
Date: 2008-05-09 03:13 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-05-09 11:36 am (UTC)Arnold Schwartzenegger was trailing in the polls against Bustamante during the leadup to the original recall election. His team managed to reframe the two-step process--recall Davis and choose a successor, which Arnold would have lost--into a single election--Schwartzenegger vs. Davis--and won handily. Bush is the least popular man in America (except Cheney), and we need to make it constantly clear that this year's elections are a referendum on his despised career.
no subject
Date: 2008-05-09 01:43 pm (UTC)The Dems need to run on the slogan:
"We won't get fooled again!"
But we both know we still will.
no subject
Date: 2008-05-09 11:59 pm (UTC)When USAns speak of a political conservative, what they mean is a conservative liberal, as opposed to a progressive liberal such as you find in the Democratic party.
Unfortunately, there aren't many conservative liberals left in the Republican party. They all eem to have signed up for the Bush-McCain post-democracy movement (a that is what I recommend we start calling their part, btw).
GOP Means Grand Old Party
Date: 2008-05-13 12:44 pm (UTC)But not the Big Boppers, because unlike the woman with Chantilly Lace and a pretty face, they don't know what we like.
Hel-lo, ba-by!
With a wiggle in the walk and a giggle in the talk, the Anonymous Sparrow move on.
no subject
Date: 2008-05-31 09:06 pm (UTC)Otherwise... Yup. I know decent (albeit mistaken and often misled) Republicans and C/conservatives, but they are only nominally (in a literal sense) connected with the current Republican Party and its seriously Radical Leaders. Unfortunately few of them seem to realize that.