Jim Henley, everyone's favorite anti-war libertarian political blogger, has been blogging up a storm recently. Meaty, if disputable, posts on the cycles of press coverage of the war, Clinton's record on military intervention, and the conservative divisions.
However, a recent post on the Democratic candidacy is the one that causes me to comment because it says something so astoundingly wrong that I have a hard time believing it.
And I think this is exactly the opposite of right. There is no circumstance under which the national new media--which are cowed and lazy, at best, when they are not outright partisans of the right wing noise machine--would have allowed the Democratic nominee to set the press agenda during August. Instead of the Swift Boat "Vets", we would have gotten "Maple Tree Tappers For Sanity". John Kerry spent the entirety of August talking about nothing but the issues--the economy, tax policy, foreign policy again and again and again--often quite forcefully; what dominated the press was the whispering campaign. We would have gotten stories about how living in Vermont had frozen Dean's brain, and people would have worn polar bears at the RNC. Ed Gillespie would have been given eight minutes to rebut Dean's crazy speech in August on all networks and then twenty minutes to praise the Imperator in September.
Would Dean have done a better job of fighting the whispering campaign? I honestly don't know. But I know that he wouldn't have been able to make it not happen.
Kerry is now, finally, being allowed to discuss the issues. Let's see what happens next. Let's make it happen next.
However, a recent post on the Democratic candidacy is the one that causes me to comment because it says something so astoundingly wrong that I have a hard time believing it.
[Daniel Radosh said that if Dean were the nominee,]... you can be sure that right now we'd be having a real national debate about the issues, and that Howard Dean would be setting the terms of that debate.
I think this is exactly right.
And I think this is exactly the opposite of right. There is no circumstance under which the national new media--which are cowed and lazy, at best, when they are not outright partisans of the right wing noise machine--would have allowed the Democratic nominee to set the press agenda during August. Instead of the Swift Boat "Vets", we would have gotten "Maple Tree Tappers For Sanity". John Kerry spent the entirety of August talking about nothing but the issues--the economy, tax policy, foreign policy again and again and again--often quite forcefully; what dominated the press was the whispering campaign. We would have gotten stories about how living in Vermont had frozen Dean's brain, and people would have worn polar bears at the RNC. Ed Gillespie would have been given eight minutes to rebut Dean's crazy speech in August on all networks and then twenty minutes to praise the Imperator in September.
Would Dean have done a better job of fighting the whispering campaign? I honestly don't know. But I know that he wouldn't have been able to make it not happen.
Kerry is now, finally, being allowed to discuss the issues. Let's see what happens next. Let's make it happen next.