womzilla: (Default)
[personal profile] womzilla
This ties in with some things I'm thinking about in another context.

In a [livejournal.com profile] james_nicoll thread about the most damaging book published within f&sf, [livejournal.com profile] goatmother said this:

If I was going to draw a distinction between good and bad [military sf], it would be this: in the good stuff, the protagonists end up with the symptoms of PTSD in at least some measure. In the bad stuff, the protagonists get over it by quoting Kipling at each other. I exaggerate only slightly.

Date: 2006-11-19 06:55 pm (UTC)
avram: (Default)
From: [personal profile] avram
Well, most soldiers never see combat anyway, so you’re not going to get two million PTSD cases for WW2.

Anyway, you may want to read this page about PTSD in older soldiers, from the US Dep’t of Veterans Affairs. It compares medical literature on the matter from before and after the formalization of PTSD as a diagnostic entity.

Date: 2006-11-19 07:15 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] wizwom.livejournal.com
I found PTSD statistics of 30% for Viet Nam, 8% for Gulf War I, 11% for Aphghanistan, and 15.5% for the current Iraq situation.

WWII and Korean were 20% lifetime, about 10% chronic.

Date: 2006-11-19 10:05 pm (UTC)
avram: (Default)
From: [personal profile] avram
Are those percentages of the total of the soldiers who fought in that war, or of the ones who saw combat?

Date: 2006-11-19 10:24 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] wizwom.livejournal.com
Total for the cadre, I would assume.

Profile

womzilla: (Default)
womzilla

March 2016

S M T W T F S
  12345
6789101112
13141516171819
202122232425 26
2728293031  

Most Popular Tags

Page Summary

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated May. 8th, 2026 02:38 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios