A short political observation
Mar. 8th, 2006 09:53 pmIt is fairly obvious that a totalitarian government is going to be, inevitably, extremely corrupt.
It's not quite as obvious that a corrupt government is going to tend inevitably towards totalitarianism.
It's not quite as obvious that a corrupt government is going to tend inevitably towards totalitarianism.
Dictatorships and Double Standards
Date: 2006-03-09 02:07 pm (UTC)I recently finished Jeff Greenfield's *People's Choice,* which deals with a muddled election and its aftermath. Several times in it, we read "to err is Truman," always with the reminder that in less than a decade the historians ranked the Man from Missouri with the Near Great Presidents, and that his status would grow even higher. (Who did the First Bush quote at the end of a nomination speech in 1992, wasn't it? Right...) Bush's 34% approval rating is a landslide compared to Truman at his lowest of 23%, which sets me to pondering future scenarios:
1) We realize that Bush was a man of true vision, deserving a place with the Near Great Presidents, as Truman does (Donald Rumsfeld will win a Pulitzer for his memoir, *Present at the Re-Creation,* dedicated to "Ambitious Secretaries, Past and Present")
2) We echo B.B. French's view that whoever takes office cannot be a poorer cuss than the one we have at present (French said that about Pierce, not knowing what would come with Buchanan. I find it odd that in my previous studies of the Presidency that the "Failure" category usually held only Ulysses S. Grant and Warren G. Harding; now, we seem to have a "Worst President Ever" group which contains Pierce, Buchanan and Andrew Johnson and never seems to mention Grant and Harding at all)
3) We realize that Philip Caputo and his journalist friends were correct, and that the final indignity is that there is no final indignity.
"I was so much older then, I'm younger than that now..."
Salaam from the Sparrow.