womzilla: (Default)
Westchester County has basically run out of gasoline, at least for private automobiles.

There are two major causes: Many gas stations are still without power, so all of the gas in their tanks is inaccessible; and riverine deliveries to the main local transshipment point (Newburgh, NY, about 60 miles north of Yonkers) have been suspended for several days because of high water on the Hudson. The latter is expected to end tomorrow (Saturday) or early Sunday, but, as it says at the link, "It's not going to happen overnight, though. It'll take a couple of days." A third, minor, cause is increased consumption by portable generators and yard equipment, which at least has contributed to hoarding and overbuying.

[livejournal.com profile] supergee witnessed some of the lesser appalling gas lines at stations near our house. Another article mentioned a station in White Plains that had a line of cars a mile long waiting, and complaints of waits 2 or 3 hours in Yonkers were common on Twitter today.

(My own experience with lines was limited to seeing a truly epic bus line in midtown Manhattan. It extended at least 2 blocks up Lexington before turning and running along 46th Street most of the way to the Park Avenue overpass--about 1/4 mile.)

Compared to having one's car or home destroyed, this is still pretty minor stuff. But it's a real problem. Running out of gas is not a problem that one can get around with mere patience or determination (walking to the subway is really not an option), and I worry that [livejournal.com profile] nellorat will not be able to reach work on Sunday. Sigh.
womzilla: (Default)
We have power but no landline phone, cable tv, or broadband. My cell phone is still working and I've turned it into a wireless hotspot for the first time, so we have some access, but pretty limited bandwidth.

No water came into the house, no branches, we were among the fortunate.

If anyone needs to reach us, try my cell. Thanks.
womzilla: (Default)
Once again, NYRSF did not win the Hugo Award for Best Semiprozine ; Locus did. I was of course immediately disappointed, but very quickly realized how happy I was for them. Editor-in-chief Liza Groen Trombi, in her acceptance, pointed out that this was the first victory for Locus in which Charles Brown was not on the ballot. Thus, she and managing editor Kirsten Gong-Wong finally have a win all their own, which fills me with delight. This is also Locus's last year of eligibility; a new rule defining Professional Publication for purposes of both Semiprozine and Fanzine were ratified at this year's Worldcon, and under the new definition, Locus is unmistakably not eligible for either category, so if they were ever going to get the separate recognition they deserve, this was the year for it.

I believe that when one is nominated for an award (that one cares about), one owes the award the courtesy of assuming one might win it. Thus, as I have for the last few years, I wrote an acceptance speech:

Wow. Thank you all. I have a choice now between being a bit dry or being a complete wreck. So, dry.

I hope you'll forgive me for running on--there are a lot of people who deserve thanks for this, and I've been waiting 15 years to do it.

I have to thank all the people who worked directly on the magazine now: my co-editors David, Kris, and [livejournal.com profile] agrumer; our webmaster, Alex Donald; and our staff and crew, Jen Gunnels, Ann Crimmins, Eugene Reynolds, [livejournal.com profile] drcpunk, Heather Masri, A. P. Canavan, Anne Zanoni, M'jit Raindancer-Stahl, and Eugene Surowitz. Thanks to all those who have gone before us. And of course to all of our contributors, too, too many to list. It takes a lot of people to make a monthly magazine.

I'd also like to thank the various members of the Semiprozine reform committee. Thank you also Weightless Books, Gavin Mike & Kelly, for becoming our new home in the ebookosphere; you were the life preserver we so needed.

Thanks to my father, John, whose bookshelves were my first and best library of sf; and to my brother, Tim, my first fannish model, who would pretend to be unimpressed by all this.

And thanks, above all, to my wife, [livejournal.com profile] nellorat, and to my co-husband, [livejournal.com profile] supergee, for understanding exactly how important all this craziness is to me.


On the bright side, in all of the other categories in which I could have an informed opinion, my preferred choice won. So, congratulations, SF Encyclopedia, [livejournal.com profile] ursulav, [livejournal.com profile] catvalente & [livejournal.com profile] matociquala & all the other Squeecasters, and [livejournal.com profile] papersky! I bloody well told each of you that you would win, but you wouldn't believe me.
womzilla: (womzilla)
A "zero tolerance" policy and a "lifetime ban" are completely separate things.

"Zero tolerance" is a type of enforcement--true "zero tolerance" means that if you break the rule, you will receive the punishment, no exceptions. "Lifetime ban" is a definition of a type punishment that is available for those who punish those who violate the policy.

A zero-tolerance policy can have many levels of punishment, based on elements such as specific offense (a "zero-tolerance" rule against possessing weapons could still have different levels of punishment for carrying a knife vs. carrying a suitcase packed with explosives) or repeat offenses. "Zero tolerance" and "lifetime ban" aren't synonyms.
womzilla: (Default)
Marvel is about to quasi-reboot their line--the Marvel NOW project is a lot of cancellations and new #1s and a lot of shuffling of creative teams. (Matt Fraction writing Fantastic Four? Hells bells, of course I'll buy that.)

I just want to note that right now I am buying 14 Marvel ongoing monthly titles. One of them has already been announced as ending with no replacement, Kieron Gillen's brilliant Journey into Mystery; others have been restarted with creative teams I'm not interested in following (Brubaker's Captain America, Fraction's Mighty Thor). I'll check back in January to see how many I'm buying then.

I also note that right now I'm buying more DC main-imprint titles than I was before the "New 52" relaunch--18, up from 11 in August 2011--so it's quite possible I'll end up getting more Marvels after the relaunch; I just don't think it's likely. DC has actually shown some cleverness in recruiting new writers from the indies (Jeff Lemire, Josh Filakov), from outside comics (China Mieville), and getting good work out of writers who had been away (Paul Levitz, Marv Wolfman). I don't see Marvel doing that; almost all the writers who have been announced so far for Marvel NOW are already working for Marvel. (The one exception so far is screenwriter/comic actor Brian "Brian from The Sarah Silverman Program" Poesen for Deadpool, which is a great choice.)

Anyway, as I said, just leaving a record.
womzilla: (womzilla)
Sixty-nine years ago, the Battle of Kursk had been underway for two weeks; it would last another four. Kursk was the last of the four major battles of the Great Patriotic War, the four years of the Nazi invasion of the Soviet Union. Kursk is almost completely absent from the modern Western memory; lacking the cliffhanger drama of the battle of Moscow, the unique horrors of Stalingrad, or the numbing scope of the 3-year siege of Leningrad, Kursk was "just" a long summer battle with no clear narrative. Kursk itself was not one of the great industrial cities of USSR, and the purpose of Operation Zitadelle, the Nazi offensive, was simply to take territory around a bulge in the front line, capturing/killing Soviet troops, shortening the front (thus freeing up some troops to send to the west as the US/British invasion became more inevitable), and giving the Axis a position of strength from which to continue the war on their own terms.

Over a million Soviet soldiers died in the battle, along with 300,000 Axis, and truly staggering amount of war materiel was lost by both sides--twice as many tanks were destroyed in the 6 weeks of Kursk as had been involved in the battle of France three years earlier. Unlike most of the battles of the European war, which were defined by sudden concentrated strikes and sweeping gestures, Kursk was a war of trenches and defense-in-depth, the Nazis throwing their superior tanks and tactics against a vastly larger and well-prepared foe. When the Germans stopped their offensive, they had achieved basically none of their goals, and the Soviets immediately began a counter-offensive that continued until the fall, taking back Orel and Kharkov from the Nazis. The Nazi failure gave the military initiative to the Soviets, who never lost it again.

Paul Carell was a German historian (and "reformed" SS official) whose books Hitler Moves East and Scorched Earth were very influential in shaping Western narratives of the Great Patriotic War. He argued that the Axis defeat at Stalingrad in February 1943 represented the end of Nazi hopes of victory. However, he argued, the Soviets were unable to follow up Stalingrad with further successes, and by the late spring, the Axis still had a hope of fighting to a draw. (What the nature of that "draw" might be is unclear--by that time, neither Hitler nor Stalin would have been likely to agree to an armistice of any sort.) However, with the failure at Kursk and the success of the Soviet offensive at Kharkov, the outcome of the war was no longer in doubt; the Nazis had irretrievably lost.

That was the end of August, 1943. However, it took another 21 months of fighting before the Soviets captured Berlin and ended the war. Of the 46 months of open warfare between the two great dictatorships, nearly half of it took place after the Third Reich had no feasible hope of doing anything other than losing completely. The invasions of Sicily and Italy; D-Day; Operation Market Garden; the Battle of the Bulge; the V-2; the (second) Warsaw Uprising; the bombing of Dresden--all of these took place during that prolonged collapse.

That's the true lesson of Kursk: a lot of awful fighting can mask the fact that the battle is already lost, or won. By the Iron Law of Institutions, the people in control of the losing side are more willing to fight to the last of their underlings than admit defeat and step down. Even though the war is won, yet the victors can not stop fighting, and there's a lot of damage still to be done.
womzilla: (Default)
Does anyone want to buy nellorat's Readercon membership? Let me know.
womzilla: (Default)
I don't think I've mentioned here that my mother's mother, mi Abuelita, died last month at the age of 96. She was born before Gallipoli, before tanks, before antibiotics, before the US had any immigration laws, in Havana before the communists controlled any country in the world. She lived through, and above, the most genocidal and the most productive century in human history so far, and managed throughout always to believe, sincerely, that things were looking up.

In late May, when Abuelita was in the hospital, I wanted to send her a get-well bear, and I called the hospital gift shop to arrange it. The woman on the phone asked me the patient's name, and when I said "Elita Crow", she exclaimed with delight, "Oh, Elita! We're all rooting for her!" That summed her up as well as any sentence could. Everyone was rooting for her because she was rooting for everyone.

From her I learned two lessons: love the things you love without shame or hesitation, and whatever you do, do with energy and joy. Oh, and 500 Rummy. That served me well, too.

It gives me pleasure, and hope, to think of her, now, smoking with lungs incorruptible, drinking with a liver invulnerable, and laughing, dancing, loving everything and everyone with a heart unceasing and eternal.

I mention this today in memory not just of her, of course. She and Tim had a tempestuous relationship (even more so than she and I did) but I know that the last time they saw each other, they were happy in each others' company as family, really, should be. Let's all be, when we can.
womzilla: (Default)
Gettier problems.

A Gettier problem is any one of a category of thought experiments in contemporary epistemology that seem to repudiate a definition of knowledge as justified true belief (JTB). The category of problem owes its name to a three-page paper published in 1963, by Edmund Gettier, called "Is Justified True Belief Knowledge?". In it, Gettier proposed two scenarios where the three criteria (justification, truth, and belief) seemed to be met, but where the majority of readers would not have felt that the result was knowledge due to the element of luck involved.

Still alive

Jul. 1st, 2012 10:21 pm
womzilla: (Default)
Most of my online social time is on Twitter (@womzilla, of course; please let me know if you'd like me to follow you), and I'm perpetually a couple of weeks behind here, but I do read you and I hope to post a little more frequently in the coming months. Love y'all.
womzilla: (Default)
The HuffPo article "Why You Shouldn't Boycott North Carolina" (over NC's shameful passage of Amendment 1 earlier this month) makes a lot of good points:


  • Here in Orange County the marriage amendment lost, with 80 percent against it and 20 percent in favor of it. In Chapel Hill, where I serve as mayor, the amendment failed even more spectacularly: 86 percent to 14 percent.

  • While winning eight out of hundred counties may not seem like much, it is important to recognize that the Great Eight ... are also home to what Americans love most about North Carolina. These counties include the cities of Asheville, Pittsboro, Cape Hatteras, Durham, Charlotte, Chapel Hill, Raleigh, and Boone.

  • We need your support to convince the rest of North Carolina that these issues are important and that equality is the only solution.



All of these swirl around 2 larger points that the writer doesn't make explicitly:

1. North Carolina is very populous but is one of the least urbanized states--in terms of the percentage of the population who live in urban areas.
2. No state--not even Mississippi or Massachusetts--is completely "red" or "blue".

Minority rights in modern America isn't so much a Northern/Southern or Coastal/Inland issue as it is an urban/rural issue. I have a larger constellation of thoughts about that (broadly speaking, the more one has direct experience of people greatly unlike one's self, the more one is willing to treat them like human beings), and it's worth reminding ourselves of this dynamic.
womzilla: (Default)
The day we left for the ICFA, I saw my first robin of the year.

As we were driving back from the airport 5 days later, I saw my first groundhog of the year. They're supposed to be in hiberation until early April, but I guess the 82F highs fooled at least this one.

What a world we are building.

(Back since Sunday but drowning in catsup catchup. People to whom I owe e-mails, be assured they are forthcoming.)
womzilla: (Default)
In much of the world, equities are traded by symbol, not by name. In the West, symbols are usually just strings of letters, sometimes abbreviations of the company name (Microsoft is MSFT, Sirius Radio is SIRI); sometimes they ARE the company name (Yum Brands, the holding company that owns a lot of food brands like Taco Bell, is YUM; 3M is MMM); and sometimes they're just unrelated or downright silly (US Steel is X; Southwest Airlines is LUV).

Unsurprisingly, because the names of the letters of the English alphabet sound alike, traders talking to each other often spell out symbol names--"M as in Mike, S as in Sarah, F as in Frank, T as in Ted"--because making mistakes is really bad. Getting AMN confused with ANN can be a 5000% error.

I realized shortly after taking a job in the equities industry that I really should learn a formal Radio Alphabet (e.g., the NATO phonetic alphabet), but I had so much else to absorb early on that I dragged my feet around it. About two months into the job, I was walking past the trading desk and I heard one of the traders telling a customer about a trade in symbol FPP, which he then spelled out as "fuck pussy pussy".

Within 5 minutes, I had a printout of the NATO alphabet taped to my monitor. I was never going to be at that much of a loss for words.
womzilla: (Default)
Tomorrow may mark the first time that the Direct Market New Comics Day has occurred 5 times in February.

The Direct Market came into existence in late 1972. When I started buying comics in the Direct Market in 1982, New Comics Day was Friday. It shifted to Thursday piecemeal between 1984 and 1990, and then to Wednesday sometime after 1991. I am not sure whether there really was a New Comics Day as early as 1980; if there was, it was probably Friday, in which case 1980 did have 5 NCD in February. So it might only have been 32 years:

YearDay of Week
1976Sunday
1980Friday*
1984Wednesday
1988Monday
1992Saturday
1996Thursday
2000Tuesday
2004Sunday
2008Friday
2012Wednesday*


Because the regular shipping calendar only covers four weeks, DC used to run special events during these "Fifth Weeks". That hasn't happened in a long time, but it seems like tomorrow would have been a natural for a revival.
womzilla: (womzilla)
One of my favorite books is Michael Richie's Please Stand By: A Prehistory of Television. It's a history of the very earliest days of television, the 20 or so years between the invention of television* and the launch of commercial television in the United States in 1948. Richie was annoyed by the degree to which standard histories of television overlooked the tremendous efforts and creativity brought to the enterprise of television during the pre-WWII era and set out to rewrite the canon to include the excluded. I respond on a visceral level to the unveiling of forgotten histories.

Many canonical histories of science fiction point to Hugo Gernsback as the inventor of the idea of science fiction; he did, after all, coin the term. No one seriously thinks he invented the method or techniques of science fiction, either as a writer (the dreadful Ralph 124C41+) or as an editor (of Amazing Stories, the first pulp dedicated exclusively to science fiction). Everyone knows that the techniques of science fiction go back to "Micromégas" and Frankenstein, through Poe and Verne and Wells and Shiel and so many other works that are clearly science fiction avant la future.

That first issue of Amazing in 1926 consisted entirely of reprints and served as a gathering-together of stories, exemplars of the types of fiction that Gernsback wanted to promote. As such, the more careful writers say that he was the first figure to approach science fiction as a distinct and coherent genre, complete with a community of readers. Although there are hundreds of works of proto-sf, there was never really a genre before Gernsback.

Well.

Over the last few years, Brian Stableford has been doing heroic work in translating French works of proto-sf into English--J.-H. Rosny aîné, Paul Féval, Maurice Renard, and many others. In the process, he has discovered that two French editors of the 19th century spent several years exactly carving out a genre of science fiction--gathering together sf works in their publications, catering to a distinct readership, and actively soliciting new works in this fiction-of-the-new. The only thing they lacked that Gernsback brought later (besides propeller beanie) was a single term for their new type of fiction--they didn't even use the existing term "roman scientifique". If they had come up with a term, it might well have become the standard.

So, there it is. A lost history of a forgotten future. Go, read.

*The invention of television occurred roughly in 1925-27 at the hands of several different people mostly independently, most notably John Logie Baird and Philo Farnsworth. The difficulty of identifying the first "television" is not much less difficult than identifying the first "science fiction novel", for mostly the same reasons.
womzilla: (Default)
Back in the mid-1970s, Philip Jose Farmer wrote two sword-and-sorcery novels about the denizens of Opar, a lost city civilization created by Edgar Rice Burroughs in 1913 in the second Tarzan novel, The Return of Tarzan.

The two novels sold decently well, but not well enough for DAW Books to publish the third novel in the series, focused on the cousin of Hadon, the protagonist of the first two novels.

Well, Subterranean Press is finally publishing The Song of Kwasin, as part of Gods of Opar, an omnibus with the first two. It's a shame that they didn't follow Farmer's observation that the third book was so distant from the first two that its best title would be Nowhere Near Opar.
womzilla: (Default)
I cannot find a music player for Android that

a) supports m3u playlists

AND

b) automatically bookmarks long audio files and resumes playing at the same point even if you go off and play another music file in the middle.

I would have thought both of these were common features, but no. "B" is a must-have for me--as noted, I listen to a lot of downloaded radio shows, and being able to stop, go to another file, and then come back in the same place is absolutely necessary. The only music player for Android that I've been able to find that does this is Astro Play. Anyone know any others?
womzilla: (Default)
The opening credits for the early 1980s family drama/comedy The Walking Dead.

Courtesy of The Comics Beat.

Love and laughter )
womzilla: (Default)
From [livejournal.com profile] nellorat:

Pick up the nearest book to you. Turn to page 45. The first sentence describes your sex life in 2012.

"A benign demigod of boundless wisdom, his existence was devoted solely to observation and solitude."

--description of Uatu the Watcher from Lee and Kirby: The Wonder Years


Oh, dear. Oh, oh, dear.
womzilla: (Default)
Selecting works for the Graphic Stories Hugo is difficult because of the requirement to nominate specific stories rather than bodies of work. Since I most still read comics in pamphlets, and then don't re-read or re-buy them in collected form, it's hard for me to tell exactly what meets eligibility. However, I think all of these were published within or had their collected editions in 2011 and are thus valid.

So, here's my long list. Now I need to figure out how to trim this to 5. [ETA: I misunderstood the eligibility rules, which leads me to make a few additions and deletions. Thanks, [livejournal.com profile] stevendj.)


  • House of Mystery: Conception (Matthew Sturges and Luca Rossi)

  • iZombie: uVampire (Chris Robeson and Michael Allard)

  • Joe the Barbarian (Grant Morrison and Sean Murphy)

  • King City (Brandon Graham)

  • Knight and Squire: For Six (Paul Cornell and Jimmy Broxton)

  • "Locke and Key: Open the Moon" (Joe Hill and Gabriel Rodriguez)

  • Morning Glories: All Will be Free (Nick Spencer and Joe Eisma)

  • Neonomicon (Alan Moore and Jacen Burrows)

  • Oglaf, Collected Edition 1 (Trudy Cooper)

  • Proof: Endangered (Alex Grecian and Riley Rossmo)

  • Saturday Morning Breakfast Cereal vol. 2: The Most Dangerous Game (Zach Weiner)

  • Secret Six: The Darkest House (Gail Simone and Jim Calafiore)

  • Unwritten: Leviathan (Mike Carey and Peter Gross)

  • The Weird World of Jack Staff by Paul Grist

  • Xombi: The Ninth Castle (John Rozum and Frazier Irving)



Stricken because these both concluded in December 2010 and are thus not eligible, but they're still really good and you should buy the collections:


  • Bulletproof Coffin (David Hine and Shakey Kane)

  • Taskmaster: Unthinkable (Fred van Lente and Jefte Palo)



  • Almost made the list: Order of the Stick: Snips and Snails and Dragon Tails by Rich Berlew. However, this volume is really a collection of shorter pieces, not a coherent whole, and none of the individual pieces are quite of Hugo caliber by themselves. And I'm really tempted to mention X-Men Legacy #260 by Mike Carey and Khoi Pham (and others), but while it's a lovely, emotionally rich turning point for one of the best characters in the X-universe, it's really just a single chapter in the middle of a very long story, much of its impact depending on not just the stories immediately proceeding it but the 30 years of stories leading up to that. As such, nominating it makes about as much sense on its own as a random chapter from The Sword of the Lictor.

    For next year, definitely expect to see Iron Man 2.0: Who Is Palmer Addley (Nick Spencer and Ariel Olivetti), the first Demon Knights arc and possibly the first I, Vampire arc, the current bifurcated Unwritten storyline, Warren Ellis's six-issue run on Secret Avengers (whatever its collective title ends up being), Casanova: Avaritia, and Locke and Key: Clockworks. And I suspect Journey Into Mystery will get in there, but I'm just starting reading that now. The "Finder" short stories in Dark Horse Comics Presents are brilliant; let's see if they turn into a story.
    Page generated May. 7th, 2026 01:44 am
    Powered by Dreamwidth Studios