womzilla: (Default)
[personal profile] womzilla
It's the cover-up.

The current incarnation of this is the Disappearing Texas Democrats fiasco. For those who came in late, early this month, the entire Democratic membership of the Texas legislature hightailed it from Texas and holed up in a Holiday Inn in Oklahoma for most of a week to prevent the legislature from having a quorum, because the Republican leaders of the legislature, under orders from US House of Representatives Tom "The Hammer" DeLay (R-Malebolgia), were about to redistrict Texas to eliminate as many as five likely Democratic congressional seats.

Leave aside the fact that Texas just redistricted last year in response to the 2000 Census and that redistricting again is a blatant partisan move in violation of a century of US political practice. Leave aside that what the Democrats did was strictly illegal, since it's not actually a crime. (No, really. That's how it's defined in Texas law.)

What the Republicans did in response to this not-criminal activity was order the Texas Department of Public Safety to find the Democrats by any means necessary. This included a DPS officer filing a false report of a missing plane with the FAA to try to get the Department of Homeland Security on the case; it also, accoding to DeLay, involved DeLay asking the FBI to get involved. Then, once it was pointed out that lying to the Dept. of Homeland Security and the FBI was probably criminal behavior, all parties involved started stonewalling, and the DPS ordered all records destroyed.

Joshua Micah Marshall is doing his damnest to keep this story from dying on the back burner of the corporate-owned media. Help him out. Write to your congresspeople about this. Make phone calls. This is a crime, and it needs to be treated as one.

question on redistricting

Date: 2003-05-24 07:48 pm (UTC)
ext_481: origami crane (Default)
From: [identity profile] pir-anha.livejournal.com
pardon the potential intrusion, and far be it from me to make excuses for republicans, but this struck a minor chord:

redistricting again is a blatant partisan move in violation of a century of US political practice

i have the -- possibly false -- impression that it is in fact a time-honoured (if not an honourable) pursuit to try and redistrict whenever one is the ruling party, no matter whether D or R. no? am i totally off my rocker and it's really only the R's who're trying to do that?

Re: question on redistricting

Date: 2003-05-24 10:46 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] marykaykare.livejournal.com
For at least the last 50 years, maybe longer, it's been done only after each decennial sentence, or by court order. When done after the census it does tend to be blatantly political, but given the ebb and flow of politics in the US, the party in power this decade is not likely to be the one in power next decade so it evens out over time.

MKK

Re: question on redistricting

Date: 2003-05-25 06:35 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] womzilla.livejournal.com
Exactly right.

Also, redistricting has gotten more and more egregious over the last fifteen years. Mark Monomier, expert on maps, has written an entire (nonpartisan) book entitled Bushmanders and Bullwinkles about how redistricting has gotten more detailed and more partisan since the 1990 Census redistricting. It didn't used to be the case that legislative districts had jagged-tooth boundaries where alternating blocks in a neighborhood were in different districts; now it's commonplace.

Profile

womzilla: (Default)
womzilla

March 2016

S M T W T F S
  12345
6789101112
13141516171819
202122232425 26
2728293031  

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated May. 11th, 2026 04:45 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios